n8n vs Zapier: Which Automation Tool Is Right for Your Business?

Zapier is the automation tool most businesses already know. n8n is the one most automation specialists move to once Zapier’s bill or its ceiling starts to hurt. Which one is right for you comes down to two things: whether your data has to stay on your own infrastructure, and how many actions your workflows actually perform each month.

That second one matters more than most comparisons admit, because the two tools do not charge for the same thing.

What Each Tool Does

Zapier is a cloud-hosted automation platform. You pick a trigger in one app, add actions in others, and Zapier runs the workflow in the background. It is designed to be set up by whoever runs the business, not a developer, and it is still the best tool in the category at that job. Paid plans add multi-step Zaps, filters, paths, webhooks and a code step that runs JavaScript or Python.

n8n is a workflow automation tool you can run yourself. The Community Edition is free to download and host under n8n’s Sustainable Use License, which permits free use for your own internal business purposes, or you can pay for the managed n8n Cloud and skip the server entirely. Workflows are built on a visual canvas of nodes, and JavaScript and Python run natively inside them, so the complexity ceiling is effectively whatever you can code. What is n8n covers the mechanics in more detail.

Neither is the “no-code” one and the “developer” one any more. Zapier has a code step, and n8n Cloud needs no server administration. The honest split is breadth and simplicity on one side, control and unit cost on the other.

The Pricing Models Are Different Shapes

This is the part that catches people out, and it is worth getting straight before you look at a single price.

Zapier charges per task. A task is one successful action inside a Zap. The trigger is free. Every action that runs bills. So a Zap that takes a form submission, looks up the customer, creates an invoice, emails it and posts to Slack spends four tasks every time it runs.

n8n charges per execution. An execution is one run of one workflow, no matter how many nodes it contains. The same five-step job costs one execution. A sixty-node monster that calls three APIs and writes to two databases also costs one execution.

Multiply that out and the gap is not a percentage, it is a factor. A workflow with six actions running a thousand times a month is 6,000 tasks on Zapier and 1,000 executions on n8n.

It also flips how you should design. On Zapier you are rewarded for keeping Zaps short, because every extra step is a recurring cost. On n8n you are rewarded for consolidating, because the run is the unit. Teams that migrate and keep building Zapier-shaped micro-workflows leave most of the saving on the table.

What Each One Costs in 2026

Zapier bills in US dollars and prices on a task slider, so the plan name sets the features and the starting volume rather than the final number. n8n bills in euros. AUD figures below are indicative, converted at US$1 = A$1.437 and EUR1 = A$1.6171, the rates on 16 October 2026.

	Price (billed annually)	Included volume	Unit
Zapier Free	US$0	100 tasks/mo, two-step Zaps only	task
Zapier Professional	from US$19.99/mo (~A$29)	750 tasks/mo, up to 2 million	task
Zapier Team	from US$69/mo (~A$99)	2,000 tasks/mo, 25 users	task
n8n Cloud Starter	EUR20/mo (~A$32)	2,500 executions/mo	execution
n8n Cloud Pro	EUR50/mo (~A$81)	10,000 executions/mo	execution
n8n self-hosted	A$9 to A$34/mo (server)	unlimited	none

Read the volume column with the unit column, not on its own. Zapier’s 750 tasks and n8n Starter’s 2,500 executions are not three times apart in capacity. Depending on how many actions your workflows perform, they can be ten or twenty times apart.

Two more things the plan names hide:

Users and workflows are unlimited on every n8n plan. You are not buying seats. A sole trader and a forty-person business on Starter pay the same EUR20, because the only thing that scales the price is executions. On Zapier, more than one person sharing connections and folders means Team, which starts at more than three times the Professional entry price.

Monthly billing on Zapier costs roughly 50 per cent more than annual at every rung of the ladder, so US$19.99 becomes US$29.99 and US$49 becomes US$73.50. n8n’s annual discount is about 17 per cent. If you are going to keep the tool anyway, the annual commitment is real money on Zapier.

Our n8n pricing guide breaks the n8n side down properly, including what does and does not count as an execution and the three costs that live outside the plan price.

A Real Month, Priced Both Ways

Take one workflow a small Australian business would actually build. A quote request arrives, the workflow checks the CRM, creates or updates the contact, writes a row to a spreadsheet, drafts a reply, sends it, and posts a notification to Slack. Six actions. It fires a thousand times a month.

On Zapier: 6,000 tasks. That is past the 5,000-task rung, which bills at about US$89 a month annually, roughly A$128, and into the one above, at about US$129 a month for 10,000 tasks, roughly A$185.

On n8n Cloud: 1,000 executions. That fits inside Starter at EUR20 a month, roughly A$32, with 1,500 executions spare.

Self-hosted: the same 1,000 executions on a 2 GB droplet at about A$17 a month, which would cost the same if the workflow fired 100,000 times.

That is a difference of about A$150 a month, or A$1,800 a year, on one workflow. At real volume it gets wider: Zapier Professional runs up to US$3,389 a month at the top of its ladder, while a self-hosted n8n instance does not care whether you push 500 executions through it or 500,000.

None of which makes Zapier bad value. At 300 tasks a month it is free, and nobody should pay a server bill or learn a canvas to avoid a cost of zero. The crossover is real and it arrives earlier than most businesses expect.

AI Is Where the Billing Unit Bites Hardest

Both tools now do AI properly. n8n has native nodes for OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, an AI Agent node with memory and tool use, and an MCP Client Tool node so an agent can call tools on an external MCP server. Zapier has AI by Zapier, AI fields, Agents and its own MCP support. On features, the gap is much narrower than it was a year ago.

On cost, it widened. Zapier’s AI steps bill on a multiplier by model tier: Standard counts as 1 task, Advanced as 3, Premium as 5, and new AI steps on paid plans default to Premium. Tool calls multiply at the same rate, using (1 x model rate) + (tool calls x model rate). So one Premium AI step that makes three tool calls spends 20 tasks. An MCP tool call is 2 tasks.

Put that through the same workflow. An AI agent that reasons once and calls three tools, a thousand times a month, is 20,000 tasks on Zapier before any of the ordinary actions around it. The identical job on n8n is 1,000 executions, and the model calls are billed by OpenAI or Anthropic directly rather than marked up through a task pool.

That is the single clearest argument for building agent work on n8n, and it is an argument about invoices rather than features.

Self-Hosting and Data Control

This is the other difference that decides things outright.

Zapier is cloud only. Your automation data passes through Zapier’s infrastructure. For most businesses that is perfectly fine. For a business handling financial records, health information or legal documents under a client contract that specifies where data may live, it sometimes is not.

n8n can be self-hosted. Workflows and the data moving through them stay on infrastructure you control.

Self-hosting is not free in the sense that matters. The server is the small number. You own the upgrades, the database backups, the SSL renewal and the 2am restart when a queue jams on a workflow the business now depends on. If that is an hour a month nobody has, A$81 for n8n Cloud Pro is genuinely cheaper than A$17 for a droplet. Start on Cloud, self-host later if volume justifies it and someone is actually going to own the box.

Worth noting for the regulated case: if you need SSO, log streaming or external secrets on a self-hosted instance, those are licensed features rather than Community Edition ones, and you are back to talking to n8n about Business or Enterprise.

Integrations: The One Place Zapier Is Clearly Ahead

Zapier connects more than 9,000 apps, exposing over 66,000 triggers and actions. n8n has more than 500 native integrations, and its directory lists more than 2,300 once community nodes are included, plus the generic HTTP node that talks to anything with a REST API.

In practice the gap matters less than the numbers suggest, because n8n covers every mainstream platform an Australian small business runs on: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, HubSpot, Salesforce, Xero, Slack, Airtable, Notion, Stripe, Shopify.

Where Zapier’s breadth wins is specific and worth checking before you commit. If one system you cannot work without is a niche tool with a maintained Zapier integration and no usable public API, that single connection can decide the whole choice. Open both integration directories, search for your actual stack, and find out before you migrate rather than after.

Complexity Ceiling

Zapier handles linear workflows well, and paid plans add filters, paths and multi-step Zaps, so “Zapier cannot branch” has not been true for years. What is still true is that a long Zap with several paths becomes hard to read, and every step in it is a recurring task cost.

n8n’s canvas handles complexity better as it grows. Loops, parallel branches, error-handling paths and sub-workflows stay legible, and sub-workflow runs do not count as separate executions, so factoring a large workflow into tidy pieces costs nothing. Code nodes cover anything the interface cannot express.

The ceiling question is really about where you expect to be in a year. If your automations will still be “when this happens, do that”, Zapier’s ceiling will never bother you.

Which Tool Should You Use?

Choose Zapier if:

• Your task volume is genuinely low, under roughly 1,000 actions a month
• You need something live this afternoon with no setup and no training
• One critical app has a Zapier integration and no n8n node or usable API
• Nobody in the business wants to think about a server, even a managed one
• You want the widest possible integration library and will pay for it

Choose n8n if:

• You are building AI-powered automations or agent workflows
• Your workflows perform several actions per run, which is where per-task billing compounds
• Your data has to stay on infrastructure you control
• More than one person needs to work on the automations without paying per seat
• You want code-level flexibility for logic a visual builder cannot express
• You expect volume to grow and do not want the bill to grow with it linearly

The practical path for most growing Australian businesses: prove the automation on Zapier’s free tier or the entry Professional rung, because the point of month one is finding out whether the automation is worth having at all. Then move the high-value, high-volume ones to n8n once the pattern is proven and the task meter starts to sting. If you want the three-way view, Zapier vs Make vs n8n covers the middle option, Zapier vs Make is the hosted-only version of the same question, and Zapier alternatives is the wider field.

---

WhatWill AI is an n8n automation agency building and running automations for Australian small businesses. Book a call and we will tell you honestly which tool your workload needs, including when the answer is to stay on Zapier.